Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Patient Endurance
It is vital to see heaven's kind hand and God's gracious smile through each frame of your life. He is in every frame and that truth should guide us with much needed perspective.
We should also be aware that he knows each frame which is a head of the one you are in. In fact He is shaping the picture that will be on that frame. This should be a source of great comfort and encouragement.
Thursday, November 26, 2009
YouTube - Facing the giants movie ep.5

Today on Thanksgiving I was watching television. I turned to TBN. They were playing the movie, "Facing the Giants." As I turned on the show it was at the part where Coach Taylor was the most discouraged with his football team. Then this prayer warrior guy (Mr. Bridges) comes into his office and reads this scripture.
I know your deeds. See, I have placed before you an open door that no one can shut. I know that you have little strength, yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name. Revelation 3:8
He then tells him that God is not through with him and he is to blossom or grow where he has been planted.
This is a very interesting verse that was quoted.
When I was called to my current location of ministry I was called to "walk through doors." I was never called to the church ministry, I was called to walk through doors.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Oh God, Bless My Mess
Question: Does God lead us into situations that end up being a mess? Or that end up leaving us hurt and disadvantaged for a time? Would God do that to His children? I think so. Why? Perhaps there are no simple or even clear answers. Maybe we need to go on a biblical quest to see what insights we can find.Abram left Ur in faith. He left everything he had known. Genesis 12:1 reads, The Lord had said to Abram, “Leave your country, your people and your father’s household and go to the land I will show you. This "leave" and "go" would be a slow 900 mile journey with great potential danger and much hardship. Abram arrives. He has done what God asked. God confirms his obedience upon his arrival to the Promise Land. "The Lord appeared to Abram and said, “To your offspringa I will give this land.” (Genesis 12:7) Great! There is no better feeling than setting out on a risk taking quest to obey God and then having His confirmation on what you have done.
Abram, now, begins to settle and verse 10 tells us, "Now there was a famine in the land, and Abram went down to Egypt to live there for a while because the famine was severe." (Genesis 12:10) Abram has experienced several tests: He was called to leave his hometown (11:31-32); his wife was barren (11:30); and the land that God promised to him is occupied (12:6). Now there is a severe famine! If you were Abram, what might you say? “I came all the way out here for this! I thought Canaan was to be a land of blessings! God, I deserve better than this. I’ve tried to serve you and live for you and this is the thanks I get for my efforts? Thanks a lot!” Of course, we do not know what Abram said. But you'd have to imagine those kind of thoughts ran through his head or were spoken from his lips.
The result is that Abram runs down to live in Egypt, because that is where the food is. Did he do the right thing in leaving the land God called him? Some would say yes. Some would say Abram simply followed the necessary direction which his circumstances required. After all, Jacob's sons went to Egypt when there was a famine in Canaan and this was in the will of God. So did many others in that part of the world. This is simply what people did.
Others would say he did not. Why? There is no report that Abram consulted God. Nor is there a report that God spoke to him to go down to Egypt. Further, there are passages which tell the Israelites that they were not to depend on the strength of the Egyptians. (Isaiah 31:1) Add to this the the consequences of Abraham's actions. He lied to Pharaoh to save his own skin. (vv.12-13) He picks up Hagar the Egyptian, through whom he has Ishmael, which ultimately will lead to the conflicts between the Jews and the Arabs.
It seems good points can be made on both sides of the debate. But if Abram was disobedient, what is very odd is that God protects and blesses Abram. Look at how Genesis records the events that follow...
He [Pharaoh] treated Abram well for her sake, and Abram acquired sheep and cattle, male and female donkeys, menservants and maidservants, and camels. But the Lord inflicted serious diseases on Pharaoh and his household because of Abram’s wife Sarai. So Pharaoh summoned Abram. “What have you done to me?” he said. “Why didn’t you tell me she was your wife? Why did you say, ‘She is my sister,’ so that I took her to be my wife? Now then, here is your wife. Take her and go!” Then Pharaoh gave orders about Abram to his men, and they sent him on his way, with his wife and everything he had. So Abram went up from Egypt to the Negev, with his wife and everything he had, and Lot went with him. Abram had become very wealthy in livestock and in silver and gold. (Genesis 12:16-13:2)
What is very odd is that if Abram was disobedient in going to Egypt then his disobedience brought prosperity, but his obedience in going to Canaan brought famine.
I don't know what all to think about this story. I may not have the most accurately interpretative read. But here are some lessons I derive...
1) God may allow us or even bring us into choices which will be very challenging or disadvantageous. This sould be in the very center of His will.
2) We may not handle these situations or testings in the most faithful way even though we may be people of great faith, as Abram was.
3) When we do not handle these situations in the most faithful way, God shows himself to be faithful. As Paul simply states,"...if we are faithless, he will remain faithful..." (2 Timothy 2:13)
4) When God shows Himself to be faithful when we are not, we grow in faith and in love and in obedience to God. These situations where we feel forced to go down to Egypt, in fact, are often desgned to increase our faith.

This story is recorded about this man of faith to show that faith grows through what we do not understand. Like Job we see God in a brighter and bigger light when we go through the tunnel of our doubt, confusion, and failure.
Monday, November 16, 2009
It's Patience Stupid!
James Carville used to say, "It's the economy stupid." No. It's patience. A lesson we need to learn through our nation's economic crisis is patience. "Love is patient." (1 Corinthians 13:4) A fruit of the Spirit is "patience." (Galatians 5:22) Some of the worst financial decisions we make are due to a lack patience. We either allow ourselves to be pressured to make purchasing decisions we shouldn't by sale's people who lack patience. We lack the patience to wait to buy an item until we can afford it. We make bad investments because we are lured by the hope of quick wealth. We lack the patience to trust God's timing for His progress to be made in our lives. We lack patience. Proverbs 13:11 states, "Wealth hastily gotten will dwindle, but those who gather little by little will increase it." (NRSV) Because of this we have developed a credit economy which has been unsustainable. Like Abraham we take Sarah's handmaid and try to fulfill God's promise in our own strength and wisdom. "Let's just get on with it and make God's plan happen," we say to ourselves. The results make life more difficult to live with.I know that in my life I need to increase in patience. Patience is a product of love. Lord, please increase my patience.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
Me and My Big Mouth

James tells us, "If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not keep a tight rein on his tongue..." (James 1:19)
I have learned this past week that I should more carefully guard my words so that I speak only what God wants to communicate through me. I have a lot of ideas about a lot of things. But in the end these ideas are useless unless they are matured and led by God.
Too many times I have the problem where I will speak by the leading of God and then as I get on a roll I keep speaking things over and above what God has called me to share. These things I share may be true but become info overload for the hearer or are ideas which are irrelevant for the place where the person is at in his/her spiritual growth.
This ties in with my previous blog on Carrie Prejan. Too often I get caught up in the drama of events, and I add to the drama by saying things which are not most helpful or clearly understood. My words need to align with my faith so that they will focus on the purposes of God, not the confusion or drama of the situation.

Another one of my temptations is to overlead. I can tend to want to over direct events in the church or in other areas where I have a vested interest. I do this by over arguing or over defending my case. My tendency to overlead demonstrates an area where I am not cooperating with the Holy Spirit as I should be. I simply need to trust the work of Holy Spirit to ultimately guide people and events as He is most capable of doing and has been doing before the beginning of time.
I need to let my words be fewer knowing that God can multiply them for his eternal purposes.
When words are many, sin is not absent, but he who holds his tongue is wise. (Proverbs 10:19)
Wednesday, November 11, 2009

This was the not the politically correct thing to say. It may have cost her the Miss USA crown. What it certainly did was cause her to be the recipient of a firestorm of controversy that has been unrelenting and brutal. Out of this Carrie Prejan has emerged as an icon of the cultural and religious right, and a pariah of the cultural left. Now she has a book about her journey titled, "Still Standing."
Christianity Today interviewed her about his upcoming book. In the book she often speaks of the important influence of her pastor, Miles McPherson. In the interview with Christianity Today, she gives this reflection concerning some of the most important guidance she received.
Christianity Today: What's the best advice he gave you about handling the stress?
Prejean: He basically told me every day, "Carrie, don't pay attention to the drama. Don't get into the drama. God has a plan for you, he chose you for this. This is your time to figure out what God has in store for you, and you will figure it out."
Wow! "Don't get into the drama...This is your time to figure out what God has in store."
This advise has personal relevance for me. Quite often I can get caught up in the drama of life, ministry, and events. The challenge for me is to figure out what God has in store. This is truly liberating and exciting. It frees you from captivity to the chaos of events and elevates your focus to take higher ground and attain greater purposes for which God has in store.
No temptation has seized you except what is common to man. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can stand up under it. (1 Cor 10:13)
This words "way out," according to David Jeremiah, convey the idea of a narrow passage of escape out of a treacherous canyon. The circumstances and situations that life throw at us can be treacherous and extremely confusing. But in finding God's purposes we can discover the way of escape. This requires taking on a narrow and forthright focus. But the journey is incredible because God is working in it!
Sunday, March 15, 2009
In contrast, I believe that one of the greatest contributions of The Shack is that is helps us to conceptulize the Trinity in some very profound, relational, and...YES...biblical ways. Further, it articulates the utterly profound importance of the doctrine. Keep in mind that the doctrine of the Trinity is the distinctive view we as Christians (whether Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant) hold of God distinct from the great monotheistic faiths of Islam and Judaism, and specially distinct from the non-monotheistic faiths of Hindusim, Buddhism, etc. Yet, there are important areas where The Shack gets the Trinity wrong.
In this writing I want to examine how The Shack can serve to bring a fresh revival of this vital doctrine.
What is the Trinity? Mack gives us somewhat of a definition...
...there are three of you and you are all one God.
(p.101)
Mackenzie...We are not three gods and we are not
talking about one god with three attitudes, like a man who is a husband, father,
and worker. I am one God and three persons, and each of the three is fully and
entirely the one. (p.101)
This is a very good defintion. First it denies "modalism." Modalism is the idea that God is simply one God who shows Himself in three ways or expressions. This is a common misconception held by too many evangelicals (specially T.D. Jakes) and The Shack serves as a corrective.
But, of course, the "one God and three persons" idea is still very confusing for most. I will be the first to admit that with our own minds we know as much about God as a fly knows about mucleur physics. But for me, if I may be so bold, the Trinity isn't confusing. I don't believe it is meant to be so hard to understand. It is the way I have come through the years to more and more think of God. I believe that if you think of God in a trinitarian way, just as you familiarize yourself with a foreign language, guess what??? the Trinity will not as foreign or strange of a concept.
What about the math of the Trinity? It is confusing for some because 1 deity + 1 deity + 1 deity=3 deities. But we emphatically say the Trinity is one God not three. What we don't realize is that when we do that kind of math we are using the wrong connection symbol. The math of the Trinity is 1 x 1 x 1=1. Let go to the beginning...
Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness..." (Genesis 1:26)
Notice that when God created He did so as one God, not as two, three, or any multiple of numbers. Yet He also uses the personal pronouns that are in a plural form..."us" and "our." God does not say, "Let me make man in my image." What is important to realize about this passage is that in the preceeding verses (1:1-25) they refer to what God does, His works in creation. Verse 26 stands in distinction in that it refers to who God is. When referring to who God is it refers to Him as a "unity (One God) within plurality (multiple persons)." At this point people have a cerebral knee jerk reaction and respond, "This makes no sense!" What a minute? In our national Pledge of Allegiance we refer to ourselves as "One nation under God, indivisible..." This concept contains the idea of a unity (one nation) which exisits in plurality (50 states).
But what does this plurality within unity have to do with God? Where does the three and the one come in? How can God be three and how can God be one? Isn't this a mathematical contradiction? The answer to this is simple...the way in which God is three is not identical in the same respect with the way God is one.
So, in what respect is God one? Let's look at Ephesians 4:2-7.
Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit— just as you were called to one hope when you were called—one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of
all, who is over all and through all and in all. But to each one of us grace
has been given as Christ apportioned it. Eph 4:2-7
Notice all the plurality of persons. All persons of the Trinity are mentioned and are separately referred to as "one Spirit," "one Lord," and "one Father." But they are also given the designation of "one." This is a practically and theologically important truth. How are they one? They are one in two very important ways: 1) The Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one in divine nature. They are equally divine and equally eternal, equally God. 2) They are completely one in unity: purpose, thought, feeling without any friction or difficulty. So what does this mean? What does this look like? The reason the Trinity is so hard for us to understand is not an issue of logic, it is an issue of experience where we are so marred by sin and selfishness. But we do have glimpses of the trinitarian experience. Pastor Kevin Miller writes: Maybe a family when it was at its most healthy and loving. A sports team when people stopped worrying about their own egos. A support group where you felt cared for in spite of your brokenness. A music group when you finally got lost in the music. Because to experience the Trinity is to experience a community of love.
It is here that The Shack lends us much conceptual help. Look at Mack's description of the Trinity as he sees Papa, Jesus, and Sarayu (Indian term meanining "air" or "wind"). On one occasion as the divine trio is preparing for a meal and are engaging in light hearted humor, Mack observes...
They passed the food to one another and Mack was spellbound watching and listening as Papa joined in the conversation Jesus and Sarayu were having. It had something to do with reconciling as estranged family, but it wasn’t what they were talking about that captured Mack, it was how they related. He never had seen three people share with such simplicity and beauty. Each seemed more aware of the other than of themselves. (p.120-121)
Again, during the preparation for the meal, Jesus drops what Mack perceived to be some type of batter or sauce. This occassion becomes the opportunity for teasing and horse play amongst the Trinity and Mack responds...
So this was God in relationship? It was beautiful and so appealing. He knew that it didn’t matter whose fault it was-the mess from some bowl had been broken, that a dish that had been planned would not be shared. Obviously, what was truly important here was the love they had for one another and the fullness it brought them. He shook his head. How different this was from the way he treated the ones he loved! (p.105)
Personally I see this as a very beautiful and compelling reflection of who God is...He is a community of mutual and self-giving love, a divine family.
And though God is one, He is also three. In what way or respect is He a plurality??? Let's suggest two ways: 1) They differ in roles, and 2) as distinct persons of love who first and foremost love each other. The Shack certainly brings out the love that the Trinity has for one another. But it seriously misrepresents the distinctions that are in God's triune relationship. The Shack adopts too much of a bland sameness in the divine persons, rather than the brilliant distinctions of orderly submission. In fact The Shack says there is no ordered distinction in the Trinity. For example...
“Mackenzie, we have no concept of final authority among us, only unity. We are in a circle of relationship, not a chain of command or ‘great chain of being’ as your ancestors termed it. What you’re seeing here is relationship without any overlay of power. We don’t need power over the other because we are always looking out for the best. Hierarchy would make no sense among us. Actually, this is your problem, not ours.” (p.122)
"That’s the beauty you see in my relationship with Abba and Sarayu. We are indeed submitted to one another and have always been so and always will be. Papa is as much submitted to me as I to him or Sarayu to me or Papa to her. Submission is not about authority and it is not obedience; it is all about relationships of love and respect. In fact, we are submitted to you in the
same way.” (p.145)
These statements are simply incorrect. For instance, we never read that the Father submits to the Son or takes any direction or guidance from Him. The Son always submits to the Father because the final position of authority rests with the Father.
Because you are sons, God sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, the
Spirit who calls out, “Abba, Father.” (Galatians 4:6)
For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son to have
life in himself. (John 5:26)
Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has
blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in
Christ. For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be
holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us to be
adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure
and will. Eph 1:3-5
...yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things
came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through
whom all things came and through whom we live. 1 Cor 8:6
In all of these passages God the Father is the one who is in leadership (headship) authority over the Son. Look at the role of the Holy Spirit in relation to the Son...Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and
the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. (1 Cor. 11:3)
If you love me, you will obey what I command. And I will ask the
Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever— the
Spirit of truth. (Jn 14:15-17)“When the Counselor comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the
Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father, he will testify about me. (Jn 15:26)
It is clear from the Bible that there is a relational distinction and ordered unity in the Trinity. The Shack blurs this and does so for, I believe, politically correct and liberal ideologies. This is an infortunate aspect of the book. Despite this here are some great areas where The Shack suceeds in its portrayal of the Trinity.But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all
truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he
will tell you what is yet to come. He will bring glory to me by taking from
what is mine and making it known to you. ( Jn 16:13-14)
1) It makes a great case for the fact that God as Trinity is a being of boundless and stable love. In fact God could not be love unless He is triune. Look at how The Shack profoundly explains this...
The way God is pictured in The Shack is in many senses biblically accurate. He is a being of boundless and overwhelming love that runs over to His creation. He is love from eternity because He is an eternal relationship of love. All that He has done is born out of the creative power of His love.“Love and relationship. All love and relationship is possible for you only because it already exists within Me, within God myself. (p.101)
"You do understand,” she continued, “that unless I had an object to love-or, more accurately, a someone to love-if I did not have such a relationship within myself, then I would not be capable of love at all? You would have a god who could not love. Or maybe worse, you would have a god who, when he chose, could only love as a limitation of his nature. That kind of god could possibly act without love, and that would be a disaster. And that, is surely not me.” (p.102)
"If there's only one God but not three Persons within the one God, then we would expect that the ultimate reality behind the universe could be silence. It could be power. It could be peace. It could be domination. It could be any of those things. But there's one thing that it could not be. The ultimate reality could not be love. Because for love to exist, there has to be a sharing, and there has to be a communication, and there has to be a self-giving. But if there's only one, there's nothing to give the self to." (???)
2) In that God is a God of boundless love He desires to expand His circle of love by inviting people to join in it. He desires for more people to come into a relationship with Himself because it increases His joy.
3) The Shack I think rightly shows that the Trinity is the model and ultimate goal for the new community of love, the church. What else are we to look like? What else are we to aspire? What else is life all about? It is God...God specifically seen and revealed as a triune being of love. Toward this end I think The Shack does the Christian community a great service.I have made you known to them, and will continue to make you known in
order that the love you have for me may be in them and that I myself may be in
them.” (John 17:26)